Community Rights Counsel Community Rights Counsel Community Rights Counsel Community Rights Counsel

About CRC

Legal Resources

Community Rights Report Newsletter

Support Us

Newsroom

Redefining Federalism

Warming Law Blog


Community Rights Counsel
1301 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 502
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: 202-296-6889
Fax: 202-296-6895


Judging the Environment Project:
William Myers


Background Information:
A Sweethert Deal for a Rogue Rancher


Since 1994, Frank Robbins has been a habitual offender of public-land grazing rules and has actively impeded BLM efforts to protect the land. From 1996 to 2001, the BLM cited Robbins for 25 different trespass violations, more than half of which were classified as "repeated willful" violations. Darrell Barnes, manager of the Worland BLM office, wrote in an internal memo to the BLM state director in March 2002 that "Mr. Robbins has shown a complete disregard for the terms and conditions of the permits and of the authority of the BLM to manage public lands." 1 He further stated, "His conduct was so lacking in reasonableness or responsibility that it became reckless or negligent and placed significant undue stress/damage on the public land resources." 2 A BLM review team recommended that BLM Law Enforcement should "consider taking criminal action … based on documented violations." 3 All available evidence points inescapably to one conclusion: Robbins is an unrepentant repeat violator of environmental safeguards.

Rather than making an example of Robbins, high level BLM officials met directly with Robbins in 2002 and William Myers' Solicitor's Office negotiated a stunningly one-sided settlement agreement that conditionally forgives 16 grazing violations dating back to 1994. It also awards Robbins: a new grazing permit; management control over certain federal lands; expanded rights-of-way across federal lands; preferential grazing fees; a special recreation permit to operate a "dude ranch"; and a promise to facilitate a land exchange. Even as the agreement was being negotiated, BLM field staff continued to document Robbins' violations of federal law. 4 Field staff reportedly was directed by higher-ups not to pursue further violations against Robbins while the agreement was being worked out. 5 Even more unusual, Robbins obtained a special status whereby only the Director of BLM or her designee may cite him for future violations - a move that would seem to render the local office's enforcement powers merely advisory. As Matthew Mead, President Bush's U.S. Attorney for Wyoming, explained in an August 2002 letter, this special process will complicate enforcement of federal grazing law in Wyoming. "What justification," Mead asks, "is there for prosecuting all permittees other than Robbins for the same conduct?" 6

Many of the provisions of the settlement agreement appear to violate federal law and regulations. See also Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, Analysis of the Robbins Settlement (2003). At a minimum, they represent astonishing deference to a rancher whose record of rangeland management, according to the BLM's own review, warrants criminal prosecution - not special benefits. According to published reports, an internal department memo spends eight pages documenting the ways the settlement agreement violates the law by altering or ignoring provisions of the Taylor Grazing Act, the Federal Land Policy and Management Act, the Federal Advisory Committee Act, and the federal regulations. 7

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------

1 Mike Stark, BLM, Rancher Settle Grazing Dispute, BILLINGS GAZETTE, June 13, 2003.
2 Id.
3 BLM, Fact Finding Review-Frank Robbins, April 16, 2002.
4 BLM records indicate that Robbins continues to violate his grazing permits and the settlement agreement and the BLM director is taking no action to enforce either federal law or the terms of the settlement against him. Letter from David L. Wallace, Supervisory Rangeland Specialist to John L. Kunz, Regional Solicitor's Office, April 14, 2003 (monitoring and allotment analysis showing Robbins's practices to be "inconsistent with the grazing permits and the Settlement Agreement"); Letter from David Wallace, Supervisory Rangeland Specialist, to Alan Kesterke, Associate State Director, BLM, Aug. 4, 2003 (summarizing monitoring efforts that show Robbins's continued permit violations); BLM, Analysis of Billing History (3/24/03) for High Island, HD, and Owl Creek Ranches (documents on file with CRC). See also Mike Stark, BLM, Rancher Settle Grazing Dispute, BILLINGS GAZETTE, June 13, 2003.
5 Mike Stark, BLM, Rancher Settle Grazing Dispute, BILLINGS GAZETTE, June 13, 2003.
6 Letter from Matthew H. Mead, US Attorney, District of Wyoming to John R. Kunz, Assistant Regional Solicitor, Department of the Interior, August 28, 2002.
7 Mike Stark, BLM, Rancher Settle Grazing Dispute, BILLINGS GAZETTE, June 13, 2003; see also Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, Analysis of the Robbins Settlement (2003).

Back to CRC Home

If you have questions or comments about this website or
Community Rights Counsel email us!

© 2005 Community Rights Counsel. All rights reserved.