Community Rights Counsel Community Rights Counsel Community Rights Counsel Community Rights Counsel

About CRC

Legal Resources

Community Rights Report Newsletter

Support Us

Newsroom

Redefining Federalism

Warming Law Blog


Community Rights Counsel
1301 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 502
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: 202-296-6889
Fax: 202-296-6895

Statement of U.S. Senator Russ Feingold
On the Importance of Considering Environmental Viewpoints in Judicial Selection

I would like to extend my thanks to all the groups represented her today, Community Rights Counsel, Environmental Defense, Alliance for Justice, and Natural Resources Defense Council, not only for inviting me to participate in this event, but for all the hard work they and their organizations do to protect and defend our environment and the rights of citizens to be its stewards.  I also am pleased to be here today with my colleague, Senator Chuck Schumer.  I admire his tenacity, and his commitment to the environment, and I know he and I are here today for very similar reasons.

Federal judges at all levels have a profound impact upon federal environmental law through the decisions that they make.  As a Senator with a deep commitment to environmental protection, I strongly believe that the environmental views of public servants must be fully vetted and evaluated.  I also believe that the Senate, in fulfilling its Constitutional role of providing advice and consent on nominees, should apply the highest standards and the strictest scrutiny to judges, and certainly to supreme Court Justices, who will serve for life.

I recognize that the areas of law that these groups are raising as examples today, such as nominees' views of the 11th Amendment, the Takings Clause, and the Commerce Clause, are critical underpinning of federal environmental laws.  In previous Congresses, as a member of the Judiciary Committee, I have opposed federal legislation that would have expanded the takings clause to require compensation if an environmental regulation caused a reduction in the value of property.  I would remind all of you today that the proponents of such legislation in Congress derived their legislative ideas from fragments of holdings in federal takings cases that didn't quite come to the same conclusion.  The opinions of federal judges carry weight, not only in the third branch of government, but in this branch as well, and we should thoroughly understand nominees' views on these issues.

As a member of the Judiciary Committee, I will continue my practice of questioning relevant nominees with respect to their views on the environment and their willingness to uphold the environmental laws that Congress has enacted.  Federal judges need to be prepared to deal with complicated natural resource and environmental quality issues, particularly those arising under federal law.

I appreciate the work these groups are doing to inform the Senate and the Administration of the important of judicial nominees' views on the environment, and I am pleased to have had an opportunity to join them in releasing their report, which should prove invaluable to the Senate as it takes on this crucial constitutional task.

###

 

To read Senator Maria Cantwell's (WA) press statement on this issue, click here.

To read Senator Edward Kennedy's (MA) press statement on this issue, click here.

To read the full report in PDF version, click here.

To go back to the main page of the report, click here.

 

Back to CRC Home

If you have questions or comments about this website or
Community Rights Counsel email us!

© 2005 Community Rights Counsel. All rights reserved.